The novel, As I Lay Dying, details the Bundren family’s journey. They travel from
their country farm to the town of Jackson in order to bury the mother of the
family, Addie Bundren, after her passing. Perhaps more important than their
collective journey is the journey of each of the individuals. Many of the
characters have ulterior motivations for traveling to Jefferson. Anse, the
father, wants a new set of teeth and finds a new wife in the town at the end of
the novel. Cash, the eldest son, saved up enough money to purchase a record player. Dewey Dell, the daughter, has become pregnant without marriage and
wants an abortion, but she is not able to tell anyone else in her family.
Vardaman, the youngest child, has his eyes set on a train set that he first saw
for the previous Christmas. The three eldest sons, Cash, Darl, and Jewel, each
have their own personal connection to Addie which reveals itself as they care
for her coffin. Within the overall plot, each character has their own important
storyline.
The narration throughout the book
is very important because it shows each characters viewpoint on the family’s
journey and their own journey. As the narration perspective changes with each
chapter, the reader gets a look into the mind of each character. This allows
the novel to show nuances of a character that could be lost amongst the many
other characters and the chaos of the plot. The philosophies and opinions of
each character are revealed through this. The reader learns about Anse’s philosophy
of humans as vertical and therefore meant to be stagnant as opposed to the
horizontal roads and traveling animals. This makes Anse’s determination to
fulfill his wife’s last wish and travel through uncharted territory impressive in
contrast to his other aspects which paint him as a primarily pathetic and faulty
character. The switch in narration also brings focus to the emotional struggle
and personal turmoil of each character. Cash is troubled when he thinks over
Darl’s decision to burn the Gillespie’s barn containing Addie’s coffin. His
morals are put to the test as he attempts to reason whether Darl was justified.
He mentally debates against himself using both Darl and Gillespie’s
perspective, but he ultimately has trouble reaching a conclusion.
A potential struggle for a film
adaptation would be to do justice to both the plot and the personal aspect of
the novel. The film has the responsibility to make the audience understand the
progression of the plot and show what the narrating character is thinking. I
was pleasantly surprised by the film’s selected solution to this problem,
through its use of split screens and voiceovers.
Throughout the film, the screen
alternates between a typical full screen and a vertically split double screen. The
split screen serves various purposes, one of which is addressing the thoughts
of the characters. The first scene where I noticed this particular use of the convention
was when Anse is sitting on the front porch of the house while his sons are in
front of the house. One side of the split screen depicts Anse from a far out
view—how the other characters are seeing him. This view supports the characterization
of Anse that dominated our class discussions. He looked pathetic and
insignificant with his hunched over posture. The other side of the screen is a
close up of Anse’s face. This side of the screen shows a more sympathetic side
to Anse because his expressions convey his emotions. He looks worried and
defeated by his wife’s sickness. Once the family is on their journey, a split screen
scene highlights Dewey Dell’s journey. When the family is confronted by the
river, they are unsure how they are going to accomplish such a daunting task. One
side of the split screen shows carries the plot forward. The family gets out of
the wagon to decide whether they will cross the river or find an alternative. The
other side of the split screen is a close up of Dewey Dell as she stands up
from the wagon. Her expression conveys the pure determination and necessity to cross
the river and get all the way to Jackson for her abortion. The crossing of the
river is ultimately disastrous. A log dislodges the coffin and all three of the
eldest brothers are knocked loose into the river. This scene also utilizes the
split screen. One side of the screen focuses on the plot. The brothers are all
flailing in the river, struggling to regain control of the wagon and their
animals. The other side of the split screen shows Anse’s face as he waits on
the other side of the river. His expression conveys his helplessness. He deeply
believed that they would get across the river successfully because they are
fulfilling his wife’s last wish. As the brothers are thrown around by the
current, his hopes come crashing down.
The voiceovers served a similar
purpose as the split screen. The film would show a character speaking directly
into the camera and then switch to the scene they were describing or the point
in the plot that demonstrated their point. Their speech would explain points
that could not be explained in a purely visual portrayal of their thoughts and
emotions. These voiceovers would be closer to the actual novel, which was
apparent in the fact that many times the voiceovers were direct quotes from the
book. When Addie dies, Cash moves her body into the coffin while using a
numbered list to explain how he made the coffin. Cash struggles to eloquently articulate
all his steps, but the amount of care and work he put into the creation is
still clear. This audio is powerful when it accompanies the screen which depicts
Cash carefully transferring Addie’s body into the coffin.
The use of split screen and
voiceover had many purposes in the motion picture—each deserving its own blog
post. The use in relation to narrative perspective in particular stood out
because it is the most noticeably unique trait of As I Lay Dying as a novel. The different narrators of each chapter are
integral to the telling of the story, and the film impressively managed to
capture this.
I think that the way the film shows the narration from the book is really good. I think that the split screen and voiceover works well for when Addie tells her story, too. Instead of just a flashback, we also get to see Addie telling the story. We can also see that she didn't like Anse when she conceived Jewel and in the other screen, we can see that he hasn't changed too much. He's still Anse.
ReplyDeleteI remember reading some reviews of Franco's film that particularly disliked the split screen techniques. They called it "amateurish," but I have to admit I enjoyed it too. Split screen seems especially relevant to Darl, with his uncanny knack for seeing into and out of other people's heads. With these unorthodox methods, it's possible to capture the emotions and styles of the various narrators in a way that more typical techniques simply cannot.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the split screen worked well with Darl. There are several scenes where we see the world through Darl's eyes on one side of the split screen and a close up of Darl on the other side. Darl is on his own and looks at up at the camera in a crazed manner.
DeleteI enjoyed the split screen, but I can see why critics would be opposed to the method. Given we only watched a few clips of the movie, I can understand how over the course of the entire movie the split screen could become disorienting and take away from the movie. Even so, the split screen addressed the obscurities of the movie in ways that I do not think any other method could.
I talked about this in my blog post a bit but like Daniel said, I thought the split screen worked well portraying the dynamic roles of Cash, Darl, and Jewel. Through the split screen we can clearly see how Jewel is different from the other two characters in both appearance and conduct. Overall though, I didn't think this film did a great job with the split screen method because I found myself constantly trying to figure out what the split screens were showing throughout the film.
ReplyDeleteI personally thought the split screen was just overused. It was very well done in specific moments, especially in scenes where Darl is "communicating" with his siblings, or when Jewel is connecting with his horse. But other times it didn't provide enough depth or justification to be used. It also made the film a little too bland rather than providing contrast for the more important scenes.
ReplyDelete